by Harnaak Singh

We summarise analysis of the Presentation by Autar Singh at the MGC EGM presented through posts Parts 1 to 8.  

He QUESTIONS the meaning of ROOP in Mahan Kosh by stating only 5 Gurus contributed to SGGS Ji.

AND

He does NOT UNDERSTAND the true meaning of JOT which passed from Guru Nanak through the Gurus to Guru Gobind and thence to Guru Granth.  

SGGS Ji’s contributions were from one Jot which took different ROOPS.  It is FOOLISH AND IGNORANT to question WHICH GURU DID OR DID NOT CONTRIBUTE.

He does NOT BELIEVE that SGGS Ji is our living Guru.  He considers our living Guru SGGS Ji a METAPHOR.  

He QUESTIONS translations of Guru Granth and as well as authentic English translation of the SRM.

He QUESTIONS the numbering of Ten Sawayeeyay and Chaupai in Gutkas.

He QUESTIONS if 5 Banees were recited during the Amrit Ceremony conducted by Guru Gobind Singh Ji.  

He MISLEADS by saying Gurbani is only in SGGS Ji  and no other Granth is needed to understand the SGGS Ji. 

BUT … 

However he has been unable to respond to questions on some verses in SGGS Ji because the explanation is in the Dasam Granth.   

He DOES NOT understand that SRM is a COMMON BASE but misleads by saying it is a COMPROMISE.

Autar in cohorts with MGC created the COMPROMISE by BANNING Guru Gobind Singh Ji’s Banee in DG.  A compromise is never really a UNIFYING FACTOR.

Guru Gobind Singh Ji’s Banee compiled in the Dasam Granth is NOT BANNED in the SRM.

He in cohorts with MGC is imposing the FALSE AND MISLEADING Ek Granth and anti- DG views on the Sangat.

BEWARE of these MISCREANTS who QUESTION EVERYTHING SIKHI and CREATE CONTROVERSY by DISTORTING and MISLEADING OUR GURUS TEACHINGS.

Thank you for reading/listening.  Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh.